Tag Archives: digital

The Poetry of Networked People

16 Oct

MATRIX logoFor an organisation devoted to technology and innovation, Northern Ireland’s annual MATRIX poetry competition is a determined attempt to tackle stereotypical distinctions between arts and sciences. 

In a part of the UK with more than its fair share of hard-edged black & white positions, it is worthwhile pointing out that in the design of laptops, tablets and phones, silver-grey with rounded corners is a very stylish choice.

Poetry is, of course, a deal further on from product design but, when innovators launch their new ventures, the value of well-chosen words can never be underestimated.  Every week we enjoy Norman’s Blog – a compendium of historical linkages often triggered by the latest excitements at the NI Science Park – and Norman Apsley’s stories are all the more memorable for the way that he tells them.

My own career in telecoms was, on the surface, a very technological pursuit but one where there were countless opportunities for wordsmiths.  It may not have been what I was paid to do but I now count those years as excellent training in creative writing – and even if my Action Pointer series (totally uncalled-for essays) raised a few senior eyebrows they often served to open minds to new possibilities.

So now, despite carrying a technology-driven label, I cannot deny that I am (and always have been) a writer.  Recognition, even in some minor way, is always satisfying – like tracking if readers crack up at the same embedded chuckle points – and today’s event is priceless. 

Few of us place enough value on words and I’d not rate my own efforts as particularly worthwhile.  For the most part, poetry is a personal and private pre-occupation, rarely shared beyond friends and family, but this day simply cannot pass without expressing my thanks to MATRIX for the honour bestowed on my lines about Linked in and tenuous social media connections.

__________

The full Groupe Intellex archive is at http://www.groupe-intellex.com

Full text of the winning entry ‘Linked In?

Keeping it Under your Hat – creating a market for personal data?

20 Jul

HAT LogoIn our latest editorial we look at the work of the RCUK Digital Economy HAT project –  ‘Hub of All Things’.

Described as a model of ‘life-as-we-don’t-yet-know-it’ we introduce readers to the aftermath of Prof Irene Ng’s book ‘Value & Worth: creating new markets in the digital economy’.

The researchers assert that the Internet is changing from serving an era of transactions to a new age – an era of of data-driven decisions.

Read our full editorial with links to the project’s recently released briefing paper.

 

Brain Gain: ICF’s book launched today

23 Jun

Before they set off on some new adventure, mountaineers do at least know the height of their target.   Writers are mountaineers who set off with far less certainty.   Their imagined summit may not exist or be hidden in a fog of ideas, experiences and confusing signals.

ICF Brain-Gain-Front-CoverHaving followed the gestation of ICF’s new publication, sensing the highs and lows of the writing team as they plotted their way forward, today’s publication moment comes, like childbirth, as a huge relief – and a cause for celebration.

ICF – The Intelligent Community Forum – has garnered years of experience of progressive communities from around the world.  This experience is now brought to bear on issues of the moment – how innovative cities create job growth in an age of disruption.

In our full review we applaud their myth-busting analysis and demolition of orthodox views.  This work underscores the need for a radical rethink of the priorities in planning for the growth of places and their people.  With so much political capital invested in the power of competition, the evidence shows very clearly that in our more-networked world ‘collaborative advantage’ is the new ‘competitive advantage’.

Read the Groupe Intellex review, ‘Brain Gain: community responses to digital disruption‘.

UK and Germany sticking with a low fibre diet

20 Feb

FTTH logoFor a country that has just celebrated gaining an Olympic Gold medal for sliding faster down slippery slopes, this is a good time to pause and reflect whether the UK is playing in the right league.’

That’s the bottom line from our observations following the publication of the FTTH Council’s latest review of market development.

Full story here

RSA City Growth Commission – deadline for submissions – 17th January

13 Jan

hi=-tech buildingAs the RSA’s Call for Evidence is set to close next Friday we were reminded to look back at how we viewed the Urban Regeneration scene in 2008 – just prior to the financial meltdown.   Such was the paucity of ground-breaking developments that we described Urban Regeneration as ‘a cottage industry’.

Now that the economic cycle is once again supportive of renewed hope for urban regeneration and there are calls for smarter (or more intelligent) cities and communities, it’s perhaps time to pick up those themes that now seem more than ever essential in the search for prosperous local economies.

Full story here

Whatever Next? Without vision the platforms perish

29 Nov

Underlying the froth of Application inventiveness lies a deeper, more fundamental, challenge for the true innovator – the creation of new enabling digital platforms to take over from tired designs that are nearing the end of their lives and can no longer be sustained by patches, fixes, makeovers and redecoration.

Full story here 

Unintended Consequences – and U-turn challenges

18 Nov

Thinking back to the summer of 2012, Michael Heseltine and his team made many good decisions. With an ear for political consensus he crafted a way to get things done – and made 89 recommendations.

It may now be increasingly beyond doubt that those right decisions were made for some of the wrong reasons – but does it really matter that some stones remained unturned?

Full story here.

Converging or Diverging? Untangling Regulatory Directions

14 Nov

Over complex regulation is a nightmare for policymakers who want to move forward and a gift for corporates bent on ‘regulatory capture’.

Teasing the tangled remits apart is the best bet for governments who wish to focus the regulatory effort where it is most needed for the delivery of national imperatives.

Ahead of debates next week at ITU Telecom World 13 in Bangkok we reflect on the mixed motivations of communications regulators and the expectations of their governments.

Full story here

A good week for digital diplomacy?

11 Nov

With so many revelations flying around this may seem an odd time to suggest it’s been a good week for digital diplomats.

In our observations of the past week (‘Digital Diplomacy: what goes around, comes around’) we note that even the Foreign Office is not unaffected by the Digital Economy.

 

 

Not symmetric, not fast, not super, not fibre – and not relevant.

29 Oct

hi=-tech buildingThe ‘Cities-are-Supreme’ brigade gathered for the RSA’s Cities Growth Commission launch yesterday.  They seemed oddly united in their view that rural dwellers should accept relative broadband poverty and stop whining.  The city enthusiasts may be searching for economic growth but curiously they overlook the poverty of digital infrastructures within their own cities.

Thirty years ago, as a young teenager, my son watched TV ads with far greater interest than he summoned for any of the programmes.  Eventually he concluded that you should always ask, ‘Why are they telling me this?’

In the late 1800’s an early expert in the new field of advertising reckoned that the message should be delivered 20 times before it gained acceptance.   From childhood we know the power of repetition.

It may be heroic engineering to squeeze a little data through a copper wire designed to do something completely different but that alone is no cause for celebration.

It may be commercially ‘prudent’ to avoid paying tax (and a tad less than communitarian or socially responsible) and it may be ‘convenient’ to overlook the provisions for asset replacement funding but we should not celebrate this prudent convenience – we should ask, ‘Prudent and convenient for whom?’

Next year no doubt someone will come up with the idea of ‘celebrating’ the 30th anniversary of the privatisation of British Telecom.  For free market enthusiasts the timing was fortuitous.  They got it off the government books five years before the penny dropped and digital communications became understood as an essential utility.  But no matter – we could pretend that we now had choice.

Even better – now we had a market we could also have a market regulator.  Oftel did a really great job – determinedly reducing prices (remember RPI-x?) and, as the incumbent felt so squeezed, the regulator very reasonably allowed that an irreducible part of their line rental charges should compensate for their need to fund the replacement of the ageing copper network on an 18-year basis.

By that reckoning we should by now all be benefitting from an access network rebuilt nearly twice over but, curiously, it seems not to have happened quite that way.   Far more convenient it seems to try and squeeze digital data down copper wires and extract much value as possible from the legacy analogue network before anyone suggests that the emperor is not wearing any clothes.  Yes, we are back to children’s stories and endless repetition. These clothes are super. They are fast. Say it often enough and folks will buy it.

Fortunately we are blessed with children who do not buy it.   They know that these clothes are not woven with fibre.  They know they are not fit for purpose.  They know that muddling through with not do.  They know that so-called ‘fibre broadband’ is not fully fibred, is not super, is not fast, is not symmetric, is not future-proofed and is not relevant for they way we live now.

They also know that they’ve been massively let down by a generation who trusted too much and did not dare to ask, “Why are they telling me this?”

The City Growth Commission will ask lots of questions – mostly about empowerment of cities, their leadership and their capacity to prosper.  In gathering evidence they’ll not apparently be asking, ‘Where are the UK’s Gigabit-Cities and who is building them?